Methods *vs* Functions *vs* Routines

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Methods *vs* Functions *vs* Routines

ThSITC
Might we Please *stick to Terminologies* (Defined Terms) for a minute:

(First)

A Method is a Method is a Method

A Function is a Function is a Function

A Routine is a Routine is a Routine.

(Second)

A static Method is a Function (having a RETURN Value)

(Third)

A static Method (also called Function) *without a return Value*

is a Routine.

Full Stop.

Thomas Schneider.


_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Methods *vs* Functions *vs* Routines

christel.u.w.pachl christel.u.w.pachl
Having no (or just a little) idea about oo languages I submit that
any change would break existing (nrx-)programs and thus should not even be
considered.
Thomas, don't waste your time
Walter
-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Thomas Schneider
Sent: Dienstag, 24. Mai 2016 03:48
To: IBM Netrexx <[hidden email]>
Subject: [Ibm-netrexx] Methods *vs* Functions *vs* Routines

Might we Please *stick to Terminologies* (Defined Terms) for a minute:

(First)

A Method is a Method is a Method

A Function is a Function is a Function

A Routine is a Routine is a Routine.

(Second)

A static Method is a Function (having a RETURN Value)

(Third)

A static Method (also called Function) *without a return Value*

is a Routine.

Full Stop.

Thomas Schneider.


_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

_______________________________________________
Ibm-netrexx mailing list
[hidden email]
Online Archive : http://ibm-netrexx.215625.n3.nabble.com/

Loading...